生物学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 115-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1736.2026.05.115

• 教学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

BOPPPS教学模式促进研究生批判性思维能力发展研究

邹 沁1,2, 孙丽超1,2, 陈振娅1,2, 马晓焉1,2, 郭淑元1, 霍毅欣1,2   

  1. 1. 北京理工大学 生命学院, 北京 100081; 2. 北京理工大学 唐山研究院, 唐山 063000
  • 出版日期:2026-10-18 发布日期:2026-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭淑元,博士,教授,研究方向为绿色生物制造,E-mail:guosy@bit.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:邹沁,博士,副研究员,研究方向为生物信息学,E-mail:zouqin@bit.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32400442)

Enhancing graduate students’ critical thinking ability through the BOPPPS teaching model

ZOU Qin1,2, SUN Lichao1,2, CHEN Zhenya1,2, MA Xiaoyan1,2, GUO Shuyuan1, HUO Yixin1,2   

  1. 1. School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. Tangshan Research Institute, Beijing Institute of Technology, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Online:2026-10-18 Published:2026-10-20

摘要: 研究以CRISPR-Cas9基因编辑技术为教学载体,针对北京理工大学生命学院研究生的培养目标,采用BOPPPS教学模式开展教学改革实践,系统探讨其对研究生批判性思维能力的培养效果。通过实验班与对照班的对比研究发现,BOPPPS教学模式在提升研究生批判性思维方面成效显著。实验班学生通过参与式学习、案例研讨和课堂辩论等多元化教学活动,能够有效运用分析、评估、推理等批判性思维技能,深入探讨基因编辑技术的科学原理、应用局限及伦理争议,并提出创新见解。相比之下,传统讲授模式虽在知识传递效率上具有优势,但在培养学生批判性思维等高阶认知能力方面存在明显不足。BOPPPS模式在实施过程中面临任务设计强度大、思维训练时间不足等挑战。基于此,研究提出通过优化任务设计、强化思维训练、构建多元评价体系等策略,进一步完善研究生批判性思维培养机制。研究结果为深化研究生教学改革、培养具有批判性思维能力的创新型人才提供理论依据和实践参考。

关键词: 批判性思维能力, CRISPR-Cas9基因编辑技术, BOPPPS教学模式, 教学改革实践, 研究生教育质量提升

Abstract: This study focused on CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology as an instructional framework and applied the BOPPPS teaching model to address the training objectives of graduate students at the School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology. Through comparative research between experimental and control classes, the study systematically explored the model’s effectiveness in cultivating critical thinking skills among graduate students. The findings demonstrated that the BOPPPS model significantly enhanced students’ critical thinking abilities. Students in the experimental class engaged in participative learning, case studies, and classroom debates, effectively applying analytical, evaluative, and reasoning skills to explore the scientific principles, application limitations, and ethical controversies of gene editing technology while proposing innovative perspectives. In contrast, the traditional lecture-based approach, though efficient in knowledge delivery, showed notable limitations in fostering higher-order cognitive skills such as critical thinking. The research also identified challenges in implementing the BOPPPS model, including overly intensive task design and insufficient time allocation for in-depth cognitive training. To address these issues, the study proposed strategies such as optimizing task design, strengthening critical thinking exercises, and establishing a diversified evaluation system to refine the mechanism for cultivating critical thinking in graduate education. These findings provided a theoretical foundation and practical references for deepening graduate education reform and nurturing innovative talents with robust critical thinking capabilities in the context of intensifying global technological competition.

Key words: critical thinking, CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology, BOPPPS teaching model, teaching reform, graduate education quality improvement

中图分类号: