生物学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥蚶与不同浓度微生态制剂净化养殖废水的研究

  

  1. 1. 浙江师范大学 化学与生命科学学院, 金华 321000;2. 浙江万里学院 生物与环境学院, 宁波 315000
  • 出版日期:2018-06-18 发布日期:2018-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 何 琳,讲师,研究方向为水产生态养殖,E-mail: hlwithyou@qq.com
  • 作者简介:周婷婷,硕士研究生,研究方向为水生生物生态养殖,E-mail: 810507612@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家贝类产业技术体系(CARS-48);浙江省公益性技术应用研究项目,生物絮团技术在海水池塘贝类养殖中的应用(2013C32058);宁波市2015年度科技富民项目,虾、贝、藻池塘综合养殖技术优化与推广(2015C10008)

The study of biological purification of aquaculture effluent with the Tegillarca granosa and different levels of microecologics

  1. 1. College of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321000;2. College of Biology and Environment, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, China
  • Online:2018-06-18 Published:2018-06-18

摘要: 主要研究泥蚶 (Tegillarca granosa) 与不同浓度的微生态制剂(EM菌)联合净化大棚对虾 (Litopenaeus vannamei) 养殖废水,旨在构建一套新型高效的综合养殖结构,降低海洋污水的排放。实验在100 L的白色聚乙烯塑料水桶中进行,每桶注入60 L的废水,实验期间不换水,不投放饵料;实验设为5组,每组设置3个重复,养殖7 d,第1组:390 μL EM菌+33粒泥蚶;第2组:510 μL EM菌+33粒泥蚶;第3组:720 μL EM菌+33粒泥蚶;第4组:只投放33粒泥蚶;第5组:空白组。研究结果表明:前4组的净化效果均高于对照组;第2组净化效果最佳,对营养盐的去除率分别为:硝酸盐,68.61%±0.25%;磷酸盐,85.34%±2.94%;氨氮,72.85%±3.62%;总氮,59.24%±3.16%;总磷,79.82%±2.15%。第1组净化效果次之,第3组和第4组净化效果依次降低。综合以上分析:添加510 μL EM菌与33粒泥蚶为最佳配比,其净化废水的能力显著高于其他组,可以为构建新型高效的综合养殖结构提供参考资料。

关键词: EM菌, 泥蚶, 养殖废水, 净化效果, 微生态制剂

Abstract: This article mainly studied the biological purification of greenhouses prawn effluent with the blood clam (Tegillarca granosa) and different levels of effective microorganisms (EM), in order to build a new and efficient integrated farming structure, and to reduce the marine sewage discharge. The blood clams and EM were reared in 100 L white polyethylene plastic barrels added with 60 L prawn pond effluent per barrel. There was no water exchange and no throw in bait during a trial for 7 days. Five groups with three replications each were set up. Group 1-4 had 33 blood clams and 390 μL, 510 μL, 720 μL and 0 μL EM bacteria, respectively. Group 5 used as control with no blood clam and EM bacteria. The results showed that the purification efficiency of group 1-4 was higher than that of the control group. The nutrient removal efficiency of group 2 was the highest, which can remove 68.61%±0.25% of nitrate, 85.34%±2.94% of phosphate, 72.85%±3.62% of ammonia nitrogen, 59.24%±3.16% of total nitrogen and 79.82%±2.15% of total phosphorus. Purification effect reduced successively in group 1, 3 and 4. The analysis showed that the 510 μL EM bacteria and 33 blood clams were the most suitable proportion, and their ability to purify waste water was significantly higher than that of other groups, which could provide reference for constructing new and efficient integrated breeding structure.

Key words: EM(effective microorganisms), blood clam, aquaculture effluent, purifying effect, microecologics